Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Twitter. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Twitter. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Thứ Tư, 8 tháng 8, 2012

New Way to Represent Client: Send Tweet to Miami Herald!



All you social media quasi-lawyer types Tannebaum is always talking about, take note:  here is the intersection of law and Twitter, revealed:
An attorney representing the former University of Miami Hurricanes safety said Tuesday night that he plans to file an injunction later this week to reinstate Armstrong to the Hurricanes football team.
The Orlando-based attorney, Matt Morgan, sent a tweet to The Miami Herald on Tuesday, saying, "We do not agree with the way they have handled Ray Ray. A very talented athlete's career is at stake.'' 
Although my research is not yet complete, I'm pretty sure "Matt Morgan" is not the popular wrestler with a large Twitter following from Lake Mary, FL.

Actually, he is this guy -- hold on, Matt the Orlando lawyer has 2043 2044 followers!

(That may be more than the Herald nowadays).

Matt also has this great quote on his bio page:
The moral arc of the universe bends at the elbow of justice.
- Martin Luther King, Jr. 
Not bad, but I prefer this:
 

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/08/08/2938965/attorney-ray-ray-armstrong-plans.html#storylink=cpy

Thứ Hai, 10 tháng 1, 2011

Feds on Twitter | 2702 Short Cut Search Warrant

What about the Feds on Twitter?

Most Twitter multimedia is handled by 3d party links. Twitter allows both public or private updates. On Twitter Direct messages are private and the sender can delete these messages. the feds noted that short URLs used to serve malicious links and code. Today we learned the feds will seek to recover direct messages and that when Twitter receives the request, they will comply and disclose that such a request has been made.

The Feds frequently use a 2702 request to short cut Search Warrant requirements. On the other hand, as of 2010, Yahoo has the following policy on 2702 requests from cybercrime investigators:

"Under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2702(b)(7) and 2702(c)(4) Yahoo! is permitted, but not required, to voluntarily disclose information, including contents of communications and customer records, to a federal, state, or local governmentalentity if Yahoo! believes in good faith that an emergency involving imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to any person requires such disclosure without delay."

Thứ Sáu, 1 tháng 10, 2010

Criminal Defense Attorney | Feds on Facebook | Social Networking and Law Enforcement Tactics

W.F. "Casey" Ebsary, Jr.
Tampa Criminal Defense Expert, W.F. ''Casey'' Ebsary, Jr., has suspected that cops use "fake identities" to "trick" users into accepting a government official as friend or otherwise provide information to the government. We believed that the feds watch Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, Flickr and other online social media and use the information for investigative (criminal or otherwise) or data gathering purposes.

A recent public records request by the EFF sought more information including:

Guides, manuals, policy statements, memoranda, presentations, or other materials explaining how government agents should collect information on social networking websites: how or when government agents may collect information through social networking websites; procedures government agents must follow to collect information through social networking websites; agreements with social-networking companies: using any visualization programs, data analysis programs or tools used to analyze data gathered from social networks; purchase orders for any visualization programs,data analysis programs or tools used to analyze data gathered from social networks; describing how information collected from social-networking websites is retained in government databases or shared with other government agencies.

How to be a Fed on Facebook

18 U.S.C. § 2702, Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section, ECPA, EFF, Electronic Communications Privacy Act, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Yahoo
Prosecutor's Obtaining Evidence From Social Networks
Training Materials
The feds produced a 33 page record. We just took a look at it and it appears to be a training program. The document was titled, "Obtaining and Using Evidence Social Networking Sites from Facebook, MySpace, Linkedin, and More." It was authored by John Lynch, Deputy Chief, Computer Crime and Jenny Ellickson, Trial Attorney of the  Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section.

The outline covered an Introduction to Social Networking Sites and an Overview of Key Social Networking Sites. Not suprisingly, buried in the training materials is the question: Why go undercover on Facebook, MySpace, etc? The answer in short succinct bullet points was to "Communicate with suspects / targets" and "Gain access to non-public info" and to "Map social relationships/networks." The training session begins:  "Most social-networking sites allow users to:

•    Create personal profiles
•    Write status updates or blog entries
•    Post photographs, videos, and audio clips
•    Send and receive private messages
•    Link to the pages of others (i.e., “friends”)"

How can Law Enforcement Obtain data from these sites?

•    Some info may be public
•    Use ECPA to get info from providers
•    Undercover operations "

The ECPA is the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) and it sets out the provisions for access, use, disclosure, interception and privacy protections of electronic communications. The feds use this information to:

•  Reveal personal communications
•  Establish motives and personal relationships
•  Provide location information
•  Prove and disprove alibis
•  Establish crime or criminal enterprise

How do the Feds get information from Facebook?

Since the Facebook Data is organized by user ID or group ID they use these resources: Data productions using the Fed's Law Enforcement Guide includes Neoprint, Photoprint, User Contact Info, Group Contact Info, and IP Logs. The feds noted that "Facebook has other data available." and that Facebook is "Often cooperative with emergency requests." That means that the feds can claim urgency and shourtcut the time frames that are usually present when legal production of this information is sought.

What do the Feds Think about MySpace?

The feds noted that MySpace is owned by Fox Interactive Media and was the most popular Social Network; was passed by Facebook in 2008; True names are less encouraged than Facebook. Feds are noting there is Messaging through messages, chat, friend updates. MySpace has a Young user base,has a history of child safety concerns, and Privacy is currently less granular than Facebook. Cybercrime defense attorney notes that Granular Privacy Controls in social networks allow authorization profiles - the user gets to decide what data to show to other friends in the network. 

How do the Feds Get Info From MySpace?

The Feds know that many profiles have public content and thatData is organized by Friend ID. Notably, MySpace requires a search warrant for private messages or bulletins that are less than 181 days old. MySpace considers friend lists to be stored content and there are fixed Data retention times for User information and stored files. MySpace retains IP logs indefinitely and information for deleted accounts is kept for a year.

What the Feds believe about Twitter?

Twitter is the market leader in “micro-blogging.” Most Twitter multimedia is handled by 3d party links. Twitter allows both public or private updates. On Twitter Direct messages are private and the sender can delete these messages. the feds noted that short URLs used to serve malicious links and code.

How do the Feds Get Information from Twitter?

The good news for the Feds is that Most Twitter content is public and Private messages are kept until the user deletes them.

The bad news for the Feds is that Twitter only retains the first login IP, there is no user contact phone number, Twitter Will not preserve data without legal process, and Twitter has a stated policy of producing data only in response to legal process.

The Feds frequently use a 2702 request to short cut Search Warrant requirements. On the other hand, as of 2010, Yahoo has the following policy on 2702 requests from cybercrime investigators:

"Under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2702(b)(7) and 2702(c)(4) Yahoo! is permitted, but not required, to voluntarily disclose information, including contents of communications and customer records, to a federal, state, or local governmentalentity if Yahoo! believes in good faith that an emergency involving imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to any person requires such disclosure without delay."

What about LinkedIn?

The feds use LinkedIn to identify experts and check the background of defense experts. The Privacy model is similar to Facebook and Profile information is not checked for reliability.

Federated Identity Issues Concern the Feds

The Feds note an upsurge in federated identity schemes. Social networking sites are increasingly adopting federated identity schemes such as OpenID, Facebook Connect. They write of concerns that Facebook, MySpace, Yahoo!, and Google authenticate identity and signin across platforms.

They give the following Example: A user can log in to a Facebook account using Google credentials. After a link is established between two accounts, Google will check and vouch for identity of its user. Authentication information split from activity information. In turn, a Facebook login may be used to authenticate.

The feds note that "If attribution is necessary, must determine identity provider - not simply the domain."

Terms of Service TOS and Privacy Policies

The Federal Agent Training materials we reviewed after the EFF Freedom of Information Act FOIA Request noted that Social networks have extensive terms of service and privacy policies, most permit emergency disclosures to Law Enforcement. All specify exceptions to respond to legal process and protect service against fraud/damage

U.S. v. Drew addressed the failure to follow TOS and whether access to a network was unauthorized under 1030? Drew addresses whether allowing a violation of a website's Terms of Service to constitute an intentional access of a computer without authorization or exceeding authorization would "result in transforming section 1030(a)(2)(C) into an overwhelmingly overbroad enactment that would convert a multitude of otherwise innocent Internet users into misdemeanant criminals."

Criminal Penalties for Law Enforcement Officers for Violating the Privacy Protection Act

The feds also are concerned about the growth of social networks and the questions it raises about the breadth of the PPA. This author notes that the Privacy Protection Act provides for criminal penalties against federal officials who willfully disclose a record in violation of the Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(i)(1).

Thứ Năm, 3 tháng 12, 2009

BREAKING -- Ervin A. Gonzalez Not Actually On Twitter!!



Ervin, I spent the requisite 3.7 hours attempting to get through your full two-page ad on pages 14 and 15 of the December 1st Florida Bar News. After several brief naps and thirty-two shots of cafecito, I persevered and made it to the end.

In it, you set forth a detailed and thoughtful agenda for change if elected as President-Elect of the Florida Bar. You already know you have my support.

But I paid particular attention to your section on technology:
"My administration will take advantage of the technological advances that have been made in recent years and provide greater access to electronic filing of court documents, internet seminars, teleconferencing meetings and interactive web based seminars and programs for Florida lawyers."
Recently we saw how you pretty much own YouTube.

So naturally I went to your website electervingonzalez.com, expecting it to be nearly as neat as the new Avatar interactive trailer and here's what I found:

Web Site Coming Soon

Huh?

Umm, that's ok -- you have a very busy practice I'm sure you'll get your IT guy to put something up soon.

Then I saw in your ad you mention your Twitter account so of course I wanted to get your "tweets" and follow you like I do Meghan McCain and Sarah Silverman but here's what I found:
We couldn't find anyone named Ervin A. Gonzalez.
Now that's odd.

When I put it "Ervin Gonzalez" this is what comes up:
Did you mean erwin gonzalez?

We couldn't find anyone named Ervin Gonzalez.
Listen, I don't want to fly off the handle and accuse your opponent of an internet-savvy "dirty-tricks" campaign or anything (that would involve me having to look up who your opponent is, for one thing).

But something is rotten in cyberspace, dude.

Ervin (alright, you too Mr. Erstwhile Opponent), you are more than welcome to use this limited plot of intertubular real estate to make your case to the good lawyers and judges of South Florida -- or at least the ones who spend way too much time screwing around on here.

Play nice, fellas!

Thứ Năm, 12 tháng 3, 2009

Important Twitter Policy Announcement.


Hi kids, sorry to pull a Badluck Schleprock on you all but did you know that advertisers know all about your little Crackberry messaging and intertube surfing habits:

Smartphones, like the iPhone and BlackBerry Curve, are the latest and potentially most extensive way for advertisers to aim ads at certain consumers. Advertisers already tailor ads for small groups of consumers on the Web based on personal information. But cellphones have a much higher potential for personalized advertising, especially when they use applications like Yelp or Urbanspoon with GPS to identify a person’s location, right down to the street corner where they are standing.

Advertisers will pay high rates for the ability to show, for example, ads for a nearby restaurant to someone leaving a Broadway show, especially when coupled with information about the gender, age, finances and interests of the consumer.

Eswar Priyadarshan, the chief technology officer of Quattro Wireless, which places advertising for clients like Sony on mobile sites, says he typically has 20 pieces of information about a customer who has visited a site or played with an application in his network. “The basic idea is, you go through all these channels, and you get as much data as possible,” he said.

The capability for collecting information has alarmed privacy advocates.

“It’s potentially a portable, personal spy,” said Jeff Chester, the executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy, who will appear before Federal Trade Commission staff members this month to brief them on privacy and mobile marketing. He is particularly concerned about data breaches, advertisers’ access to sensitive health or financial information, and a lack of transparency about how advertisers are collecting data. “Users are going to be inclined to say, sure, what’s harmful about a click, not realizing that they’ve consented to give up their information.”
Question for you civil litigators -- if advertisers can obtain that kind of personal information, don't you think opposing parties could seek to discover it as well?

Which all leads me to this very important Twitter policy announcement:
Henceforth I will only send Twitter messages that consist, in whole or in part, of texts sent to or from former Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick.
Thank you for your cooperation.

Bài đăng phổ biến