The First District Court today reversed a lower tribunal’s non-final order entered in a dissolution of marriage action in Achurra v. Achurra, an income deduction order which required the Husband to replenish the children’s pre-paid college accounts by deductions from his income. In short, the IDO was not for support, and as such was not statutorily justified.
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
Bài đăng phổ biến
-
Here's an interesting opinion from Magistrate Judge Torres awarding defendants attorney's fees for opposing a copyright infringemen... -
Hi kids, the heat is on and the bunker denizens are leading the way with their official 3d DCA summer pickle ball league -- judicial gentle... -
Having been disappointed by several recent 11th Circuit opinions, I am pleased to see here a straightforward application of the "econo...
-
That old W.C. Fields line is ringing in my head, as the wind kicks up and rip tides batter the coast. I have to be honest, with the emerging... -
Greenberg Traurig says it's not really necessary; Judge Middlebrooks says it is probably a good idea: In response, Plaintiff argues, in... -
Shuster & Saben Defeats US Bank & Douglas Zahm PA in Foreclosure Appeal In 2011, firm attorney Richard Shuster obtained the dis... -
Federal Rule Violation If you have been charged with USCA0024 FEDERAL RULE VIOLATION you can call a Defense Attorney Tampa at 1-877-793-9290... -
Sheesh, does anyone have any news of any interest? Does it count that I saw Ervin rockin' some hard-core aviators outside the courthous... -
Now that's a headline I thought I'd never write. Actually, it's a very unfortunate case involving a tourist who died riding a Ba... -
Many of us have hired these guys as experts over the years, and I see the firm is merging and changing its name : South Florida's eight...
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét