Thứ Sáu, 8 tháng 6, 2007

Strange Days at the Second

The second this week affirmed the rejection of a Mother's petition to modify support, which was filed stating that the current payor was not the father and should be released from his obligation…then they make clear that he is not prohibited from seeking any such relief…and cite to chapter 742…seems like paternity's already determined, and of course this is intrinsic fraud…so I guess they're telling him to set aside the original judgment and hope he's timely? See Hukill v. Shelton

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét

Bài đăng phổ biến