Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Quintairos Prieto. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Quintairos Prieto. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Thứ Tư, 6 tháng 10, 2010

Tea Partiers Move To Sanction Each Other!


When last we checked in on the local tea party-on-tea party battle raging before Judge Marra, plaintiff's counsel filed an emergency motion to withdraw and there were somewhat odd cloak-and-dagger allegations flying back and forth.

On September 7, the Court granted the motion to withdraw and gave the plaintiffs until October 1 to find new counsel.

On September 30 -- not October 1 -- the defendant tea party filed a motion for sanctions, arguing that.....well you can read the darn thing yourself.

Plaintiffs have now responded -- through new lawyer Tim Lucero -- and they argue....well, I've Scribd it here.  They also demand $2k from defendants for having to prepare a response.

What a fine litigious mess these innocent patriots have wandered into!

Thứ Năm, 5 tháng 8, 2010

Hey -- Anything Happening in the SD FL Tea Party Case?

Tea Party Withdrawal Motion

Funny you should ask!

First, the plaintiffs filed an emergency motion seeking to file a motion under seal because the motion allegedly contained defamatory statements made by defendants about plaintiffs and they did not want these allegedly false statements further disseminated.

 Judge Marra, however, said that if that were so then all actions for defamation, slander, or libel would be entitled to be filed under seal.

(Smart guy, this judge.)

Also, the plaintiffs filed the emergency motion through the CM/ECF system, which is a no-no.

So then what?

Well, funny you should ask.

Then plaintiffs' counsel Gus Sardinia and Frank Herrera filed a motion to withdraw as counsel, saying that there may be conflict in continuing to represent the plaintiffs because the lawyers are considering filing their own lawsuit against the defendants over the allegedly defamatory statements:
On or about July 29, 2010 it came to the undersigned’s attention that the Defendants had begun defaming the Plaintiffs and their counsel. Plaintiffs attempted to bring the same to the attention of the Court under seal, but such relief was denied. (D.E. 56 & 57).1 Having evaluated the defamatory statements, Plaintiffs’ counsel is considering bringing an action of their own against the Defendants in connection with the defamatory statements.
 They also ask Judge Marra the following:
Based on a recent string of emails between counsel and Mr. Guetzloe, the undersigned anticipates that the Defendants will oppose this Motion falsely asserting that the undersigned have perpetuated some wrongful campaign of injustice on the Defendants. In the event that the Defendants’ opposition to the instant Motion includes any defamatory statements against the undersigned (as it is anticipated it will), or reference to prior defamatory statements, counsel asks that the Court immediately strike or seal the same to avoid the perpetuation of such defamation.

So in other words everything is pretty much hunky dory in Tea Party land!

More on it all here.

Thứ Ba, 19 tháng 1, 2010

Hot Tea on Tea Party Action!

SFTP v Tea Party

You know, at least to me, they were much more interesting when they were "tea baggers."

Still, I suppose since it was just filed in the SD FL we should take a look at the complaint, which concerns the soon-to-be-doomed Tea Party movement:

A group of Florida Tea Partiers has filed suit against the team of conservative activists that registered the Tea Party of Florida (TPOF) as an official state party, alleging that their rivals "fully intend to 'hijack' the phrase 'Tea Party' for their political will and objectives."

In the lawsuit, filed moments ago in federal court in Florida, the Tea Partiers seek to push back against a bid by Orlando lawyer Fred O'Neal, and his close ally, GOP political consultant Doug Guetzloe, to claim rights to the Tea Party name.

In doing so, the Florida Tea Partiers become just the latest to sound the alarm about what they see as the increasing co-optation of a grassroots movement by political insiders. "We have a very successful movement, similar to the Civil Rights movement, or women's suffrage. And we have a political entity that's trying to take advantage of that," one of the plaintiffs, Everett Wilkinson, told TPMmuckraker in an interview. "They're trying to take that success and momentum and hijack it for their own political and/or personal needs."

Nothing coming up on PACER, so I don't know the judge assignment yet.

The suit was filed by Frank Herrera, now at Quintairos, Prieto in the Datran Center.

Before that Frank used to be at a quiet little firm you may have heard about in Fort Lauderdale, oh what's the name again?

Man, I gotta cut back on those Gibsons.....

Bài đăng phổ biến