The Third District Court of Appeal reversed today in Guzzardi v. Guzzardi, a case in which relocation was permitted post-judgment. While the Court found no reversible error in the Court’s use of Florida Statute 61.13001 (2011) despite the existence of an order specifically governing future relocation, it did find error in the fact that there was no evidence permitting a finding that a substantial change in circumstances had occurred.
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
Bài đăng phổ biến
-
You would think after forty-seven thousand gazillion years of jurisprudence, litigators would be savvy enough to not argue the same re...
-
Here's an interesting opinion from Magistrate Judge Torres awarding defendants attorney's fees for opposing a copyright infringemen... -
Federal Rule Violation If you have been charged with USCA0024 FEDERAL RULE VIOLATION you can call a Defense Attorney Tampa at 1-877-793-9290... -
I don't know, I feel like we're getting a little Frank Jimenez chronic here, and yet more news keeps breaking. Now it's this , i... -
The Second District Court of Appeal ruled yesterday in Payne v. Payne , a case in which the parties sought dissolution of a seventeen year m...
-
Shuster & Saben Defeats US Bank & Douglas Zahm PA in Foreclosure Appeal In 2011, firm attorney Richard Shuster obtained the dis... -
In Atlantic Shores v. 507 South Street Corporation, here's the link , the court held that an objecting neighbor could not litigate a hei...
-
Tallahassee Police Department Cyber Crimes Unit tallahassee.com - www.tallahassee.com "Hard drive duplication is one of the first and m...
-
In Powell v. City of Sarasota, here's the link, http://www.2dca.org/opinion/September%2013,%202006/2D05-4850.pdf , the Second DCA held t...
-
"ANKARA, Turkey -- On Aug. 16, 2005, a CNN television news bulletin alerted viewers that computers at the network's New York and At...
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét