Quite often, people will ask me what the penalties are in a case that just happens to be exactly like their case. So, hat they really mean, is “what am I going to be sentenced to?”
Here is the simple, unpopular, true answer: I don’t know. No lawyer does. Why?
Before we can answer a specific question for a specific person about a specific case regarding specific facts and analyze the constitutional law, statutory law, rules of criminal procedure – and more, we cannot give anything more than a general answer. We can tell you the maximum penalties, some of the collateral consequences, and even some of the red flags. But that's about it.
After all, are you talking about a sentencing with representation or without – there is a difference. Will there be a trial or not? Do you have technical defenses you cannot identify because you are not an experienced criminal defense attorney? There are quite a few questions that have to be answered, and since the answers to these questions are important, some criminal cases take months or even years to resolve. However, most people want an easy answer without a lot of diagnosis. This is like suspecting that lump on your breast is cancer, but deciding to ask around among your friends instead of going to the right type of doctor and getting a proper diagnosis and treatment.
The government prosecuting you couldn't be happier and loves this "Do It Yourself" approach.
In today’s economy, the prosecution knows that penny pinching consumers will rush to the Internet and try to handle the case without incurring the expense of lawyer’s fess to a criminal defense lawyer. As a result, the prosecution is able to make most first offender sentences sound like candy being handed out to babies when in fact, these sentences can cause a lifetime of misery. Two quick stories (often repeated, as common sense is not very common):
1) Self representing defendant is charged with Minor in Possession of Alcohol. A lawyer quotes $1,500.00 for representation, so the minor decides to DIY. After all, they weren't "arrested" because they were given a "ticket" ( a criminal court summons). Besides, the handy dandy government form to settle the case for a plea of No Contest just happens to be . . . on the back of the criminal summons! How amazingly convenient to just "pay a fine" of $250.00 and not have to go to court, right?
Each month we get a call where someone does exactly that, and finds they can't get a job after taking out massive student loans. They have "alcohol/drug related criminal history" in the eyes of future employers. We are sometimes unable to fix this type of mistake effectively later on, something that usually is easy for us to fix if consulted immediately. Time is of the essence. So much for "plea bargain" number one.
2) Self representing defendant is charged with No Valid Drivers License. Another second degree misdemeanor with a maximum of sixty (60) days in jail. My best example is a woman who really stood out in the courtroom - obviously a business owner or a professional too smart to need to hire a lawyer. Until after she entered her no contest plea and was sentenced to sixty (60) days in jail. As she began to cry, you could hear in a pin drop in the courtroom. Well, other than her stunned sobs as she was led away in handcuffs.
So, when you go to the websites where you get “free legal advice,” remember what you paid for that is what it is worth.
The wisest use of the Internet is simple: If you can go to jail, no matter how remote you think the possibility is, you use the Internet to help you select a lawyer.
Unless you like Courthouse Surprise.
Use the largest online attorney directory to quickly find detailed profiles of Florida lawyers and law firms in your area.
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn second degree misdemeanor. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn second degree misdemeanor. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Chủ Nhật, 16 tháng 12, 2012
What are the penalties for (fill in the blank): Representing Yourself
Chủ Nhật, 19 tháng 9, 2010
Florida Felony and Misdemeanor | Statute of Limitations | Theft and other Charges
![]() |
| Statute of Limitations |
The Florida Criminal Statute of Limitations, Theft, Drug and general Felony Statutes of Limitations sometimes depends on the nature of the criminal charges. Under Florida law, a second degree misdemeanor must commence within one (1) year of the alleged incident. a first degree misdemeanor has two (2) years to commence prosecution. First Degree (1st) felonies are 4 years and all other felonies ( 2nd and 3rd Degree are 3 years.
The Statute provides, in part:
775.15 Time limitations; general time limitations; exceptions.—
(1)A prosecution for a capital felony, a life felony, or a felony that resulted in a death may be commenced at any time. If the death penalty is held to be unconstitutional by the Florida Supreme Court or the United States Supreme Court, all crimes designated as capital felonies shall be considered life felonies for the purposes of this section, and prosecution for such crimes may be commenced at any time.
(2)Except as otherwise provided in this section, prosecutions for other offenses are subject to the following periods of limitation:
(a)A prosecution for a felony of the first degree must be commenced within 4 years after it is committed.
(b)A prosecution for any other felony must be commenced within 3 years after it is committed.
(c)A prosecution for a misdemeanor of the first degree must be commenced within 2 years after it is committed.
(d)A prosecution for a misdemeanor of the second degree or a noncriminal violation must be commenced within 1 year after it is committed.
(3)An offense is committed either when every element has occurred or, if a legislative purpose to prohibit a continuing course of conduct plainly appears, at the time when the course of conduct or the defendant’s complicity therein is terminated. Time starts to run on the day after the offense is committed.
(4)(a)Prosecution on a charge on which the defendant has previously been arrested or served with a summons is commenced by the filing of an indictment, information, or other charging document.
(b)A prosecution on a charge on which the defendant has not previously been arrested or served with a summons is commenced when either an indictment or information is filed, provided the capias, summons, or other process issued on such indictment or information is executed without unreasonable delay. In determining what is reasonable, inability to locate the defendant after diligent search or the defendant’s absence from the state shall be considered. The failure to execute process on or extradite a defendant in another state who has been charged by information or indictment with a crime in this state shall not constitute an unreasonable delay.
(c)If, however, an indictment or information has been filed within the time period prescribed in this section and the indictment or information is dismissed or set aside because of a defect in its content or form after the time period has elapsed, the period for commencing prosecution shall be extended 3 months from the time the indictment or information is dismissed or set aside.
(5)The period of limitation does not run during any time when the defendant is continuously absent from the state or has no reasonably ascertainable place of abode or work within the state. This provision shall not extend the period of limitation otherwise applicable by more than 3 years, but shall not be construed to limit the prosecution of a defendant who has been timely charged by indictment or information or other charging document and who has not been arrested due to his or her absence from this state or has not been extradited for prosecution from another state.
(6)A prosecution for perjury in an official proceeding that relates to the prosecution of a capital felony may be commenced at any time.
(7)A prosecution for a felony that resulted in injury to any person, when such felony arises from the use of a “destructive device,” as defined in s. 790.001, may be commenced within 10 years.
(8)A prosecution for a felony violation of chapter 517 or s. 409.920 must be commenced within 5 years after the violation is committed.
(9)A prosecution for a felony violation of chapter 403 must be commenced within 5 years after the date of discovery of the violation.
(10)A prosecution for a felony violation of s. 825.102 or s. 825.103 must be commenced within 5 years after it is committed.
(11)A prosecution for a felony violation of ss. 440.105 and 817.234 must be commenced within 5 years after the violation is committed.
(12)If the period prescribed in subsection (2), subsection (8), subsection (9), subsection (10), or subsection
(11) has expired, a prosecution may nevertheless be commenced for:
(a)Any offense, a material element of which is either fraud or a breach of fiduciary obligation, within 1 year after discovery of the offense by an aggrieved party or by a person who has a legal duty to represent an aggrieved party and who is himself or herself not a party to the offense, but in no case shall this provision extend the period of limitation otherwise applicable by more than 3 years.
(b)Any offense based upon misconduct in office by a public officer or employee at any time when the defendant is in public office or employment, within 2 years from the time he or she leaves public office or employment, or during any time permitted by any other part of this section, whichever time is greater.
(13)(a)If the victim of a violation of s. 794.011, former s. 794.05, Florida Statutes 1995, s. 800.04, s. 826.04, or s. 847.0135(5) is under the age of 18, the applicable period of limitation, if any, does not begin to run until the victim has reached the age of 18 or the violation is reported to a law enforcement agency or other governmental agency, whichever occurs earlier. Such law enforcement agency or other governmental agency shall promptly report such allegation to the state attorney for the judicial circuit in which the alleged violation occurred. If the offense is a first or second degree felony violation of s. 794.011, and the offense is reported within 72 hours after its commission, the prosecution for such offense may be commenced at any time. This paragraph applies to any such offense except an offense the prosecution of which would have been barred by subsection (2) on or before December 31, 1984.
(b)If the offense is a first degree felony violation of s. 794.011 and the victim was under 18 years of age at the time the offense was committed, a prosecution of the offense may be commenced at any time. This paragraph applies to any such offense except an offense the prosecution of which would have been barred by subsection (2) on or before October 1, 2003.
(c)If the offense is a violation of s. 794.011 and the victim was under 16 years of age at the time the offense was committed, a prosecution of the offense may be commenced at any time. This paragraph applies to any such offense except an offense the prosecution of which would have been barred by subsection (2) on or before July 1, 2010.
(14)A prosecution for a first or second degree felony violation of s. 794.011, if the victim is 18 years of age or older at the time of the offense and the offense is reported to a law enforcement agency within 72 hours after commission of the offense, may be commenced at any time. If the offense is not reported within 72 hours after the commission of the offense, the prosecution must be commenced within the time periods prescribed in subsection (2).
(15)(a)In addition to the time periods prescribed in this section, a prosecution for any of the following offenses may be commenced within 1 year after the date on which the identity of the accused is established, or should have been established by the exercise of due diligence, through the analysis of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) evidence, if a sufficient portion of the evidence collected at the time of the original investigation and tested for DNA is preserved and available for testing by the accused:
1.An offense of sexual battery under chapter 794.
2.A lewd or lascivious offense under s. 800.04 or s. 825.1025.
(b)This subsection applies to any offense that is not otherwise barred from prosecution between July 1, 2004, and June 30, 2006.
(16)(a)In addition to the time periods prescribed in this section, a prosecution for any of the following offenses may be commenced at any time after the date on which the identity of the accused is established, or should have been established by the exercise of due diligence, through the analysis of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) evidence, if a sufficient portion of the evidence collected at the time of the original investigation and tested for DNA is preserved and available for testing by the accused:
1.Aggravated battery or any felony battery offense under chapter 784.
2.Kidnapping under s. 787.01 or false imprisonment under s. 787.02.
3.An offense of sexual battery under chapter 794.
4.A lewd or lascivious offense under s. 800.04, s. 825.1025, or s. 847.0135(5).
5.A burglary offense under s. 810.02.
6.A robbery offense under s. 812.13, s. 812.131, or s. 812.135.
7.Carjacking under s. 812.133.
8.Aggravated child abuse under s. 827.03.
Florida Criminal Statute of Limitations
Florida Criminal Statute of Limitations
Nhãn:
775.15,
first degree misdemeanor,
Florida Criminal Statute of Limitations,
second degree misdemeanor
Google Account Video Purchases
1101 Channelside Dr, Tampa, FL 33602, USA
Đăng ký:
Bài đăng (Atom)
Bài đăng phổ biến
-
The Second District Court of Appeal ruled yesterday in Payne v. Payne , a case in which the parties sought dissolution of a seventeen year m...
-
Federal Rule Violation If you have been charged with USCA0024 FEDERAL RULE VIOLATION you can call a Defense Attorney Tampa at 1-877-793-9290...
-
11th Circuit, 11th Schmircuit, that's what I always say. And I see I'm not alone. On Friday in the closely-watched Checking Overdraf...
-
I don't know, I feel like we're getting a little Frank Jimenez chronic here, and yet more news keeps breaking. Now it's this , i...
-
In the very long saga of Fort Lauderdale attorney Robert Ingham 's doomed representation of MCS against Essent Healthcare, Judge Seitz ...
-
Here is the Senate Judiciary Committee agenda (there was a live webcast too). From a well-placed source: He finished – no hard questions- ...
-
The Second District Court of Appeal ruled yesterday in Zambuto v. Zambuto , reversing the lower court’s ruling on two grounds. The District...
-
Here's an interesting opinion from Magistrate Judge Torres awarding defendants attorney's fees for opposing a copyright infringemen...
-
Our friend Glenn continues to pretend he's a lawyer, except now he's a top-notch US Attorney taking pot shots at the prosecutorial...
-
In Atlantic Shores v. 507 South Street Corporation, here's the link , the court held that an objecting neighbor could not litigate a hei...
