The First District Court of Appeal reversed on a single issue today in Blossman v. Blossman, the valuation of the parties’ voting and non-voting stock in the Abita corporation. Evidently each party’s expert used a different method of valuing stock, and the court below used a figure that was an average of the two. As this averaging of multiple valuation methods is not permitted, reversal was required.
Use the largest online attorney directory to quickly find detailed profiles of Florida lawyers and law firms in your area.
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
Bài đăng phổ biến
-
You would think after forty-seven thousand gazillion years of jurisprudence, litigators would be savvy enough to not argue the same re...
-
Here's an interesting opinion from Magistrate Judge Torres awarding defendants attorney's fees for opposing a copyright infringemen...
-
Federal Rule Violation If you have been charged with USCA0024 FEDERAL RULE VIOLATION you can call a Defense Attorney Tampa at 1-877-793-9290...
-
I don't know, I feel like we're getting a little Frank Jimenez chronic here, and yet more news keeps breaking. Now it's this , i...
-
The Second District Court of Appeal ruled yesterday in Payne v. Payne , a case in which the parties sought dissolution of a seventeen year m...
-
Shuster & Saben Defeats US Bank & Douglas Zahm PA in Foreclosure Appeal In 2011, firm attorney Richard Shuster obtained the dis...
-
In Atlantic Shores v. 507 South Street Corporation, here's the link , the court held that an objecting neighbor could not litigate a hei...
-
Tallahassee Police Department Cyber Crimes Unit tallahassee.com - www.tallahassee.com "Hard drive duplication is one of the first and m...
-
In Powell v. City of Sarasota, here's the link, http://www.2dca.org/opinion/September%2013,%202006/2D05-4850.pdf , the Second DCA held t...
-
"ANKARA, Turkey -- On Aug. 16, 2005, a CNN television news bulletin alerted viewers that computers at the network's New York and At...
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét