The Fourth District Court today reversed the alimony award below in Kitchens v. Kitchens on the basis of the disparity in the parties' income it would create. The Court paid particular attention to the lower tribunal's inclusion of discretionary disbursements from retirement as income, drawing a clear line between mandatory IRA withdrawals due to age and discretionary receipt of funds from retirement.
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
Bài đăng phổ biến
-
You would think after forty-seven thousand gazillion years of jurisprudence, litigators would be savvy enough to not argue the same re...
-
The Second District Court of Appeal ruled yesterday in Payne v. Payne , a case in which the parties sought dissolution of a seventeen year m...
-
I don't know, I feel like we're getting a little Frank Jimenez chronic here, and yet more news keeps breaking. Now it's this , i... -
Federal Rule Violation If you have been charged with USCA0024 FEDERAL RULE VIOLATION you can call a Defense Attorney Tampa at 1-877-793-9290... -
11th Circuit, 11th Schmircuit, that's what I always say. And I see I'm not alone. On Friday in the closely-watched Checking Overdraf... -
In the very long saga of Fort Lauderdale attorney Robert Ingham 's doomed representation of MCS against Essent Healthcare, Judge Seitz ... -
Here's an interesting opinion from Magistrate Judge Torres awarding defendants attorney's fees for opposing a copyright infringemen... -
Here is the Senate Judiciary Committee agenda (there was a live webcast too). From a well-placed source: He finished – no hard questions- ... -
The Second District Court of Appeal ruled yesterday in Zambuto v. Zambuto , reversing the lower court’s ruling on two grounds. The District...
-
In Atlantic Shores v. 507 South Street Corporation, here's the link , the court held that an objecting neighbor could not litigate a hei...
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét