Here's why:
"Dr. Rekers' testimony was far from a neutral and unbiased recitation of the relevant scientific evidence. Dr. Rekers' beliefs are motivated by his strong ideological and theological convictions that are not consistent with the science. Based on his testimony and demeanor at trial, the court can not consider his testimony to be credible nor worthy of forming the basis of public policy.''
The Florida Attorney General's Office has appealed Lederman's ruling, and a decision is expected anytime.
Not bad, Judge, but I would have added:
Oh yeah, that health-care suing fella who blew -- metaphorically of course -- $87k of taxpayer monies on this tortured hypocrite.
BTW, Bill, scrubbing your wall won't erase the taint.
"Further, based on his preposterous mustache and absurd comb-over, this man is either a buffoon or a closeted self-hating homosexual, or possibly both."Wait a second, who is our dummkopf attorney general again?
Oh yeah, that health-care suing fella who blew -- metaphorically of course -- $87k of taxpayer monies on this tortured hypocrite.
BTW, Bill, scrubbing your wall won't erase the taint.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét